AS1 Anonymized Feedback: Submission H

Public anonymized showcase. This is the complete case-by-case feedback panel. Group identity, exact numeric grade, raw artifacts, logs, source paths, and hidden checker details have been omitted. Back to the results panel.

Grading date: 2026-05-18 17:42

Automated feedback for Assignment 1. Open a case to see what was expected, what your submission produced, and which files to inspect next.

0 / 43 test cases fully correct (0%)
1 / 1 automated checks passed (100%)
43 test cases need review
43 cases were not fully assessed
Show report details

Run scope: Full run across the loaded DARP and Watertaxi cases (43 total).

Case outcomes: 0 fully correct, 0 partial, 0 with no passing checks, 43 not assessed after an earlier run or output problem, 0 reduced-scope, 0 otherwise not assessed.

Automated checks passed: 1 / 1 (100%)

Compatibility handling: In 42 cases, the grader accepted an alternate flag, file, or entrypoint layout before checking correctness. This affected 0 passing checks.

Check Area Passed Needs Work Not Assessed Counts Toward Grade?
Execution1 / 48047No
Output format0 / 202No
Correctness0 / 4510451Yes

Priority Issues

Start with the most widespread problem first. Fixing one root cause often clears several cases at once.

This correctness check was not assessed because the submission could not be run with the required assignment CLI arguments for this case. The report records the entrypoint or argument problem separately so it is not repeated for every blocked check.
Affects 450 checks in 42 report items
Observed: This correctness check was not assessed because the submission could not be run with the required assignment CLI arguments for this case. The report records the entrypoint or argument problem separ...
Next step: Open the affected cases below and inspect the linked evidence files.
This execution check was not assessed because the submission could not be run with the required assignment CLI arguments for this case. The report records the entrypoint or argument problem separately so it is not repeated for every blocked case.
Affects 47 checks in 42 report items
Observed: This execution check was not assessed because the submission could not be run with the required assignment CLI arguments for this case. The report records the entrypoint or argument problem separat...
Next step: Open the affected cases below and inspect the linked evidence files.
The classic I/O contract check was not assessed because the representative case could not be run with the required assignment CLI arguments. The report records that entrypoint or argument problem separately.
Affects 1 check in 1 report item: DARP I/O contract
Observed: The classic I/O contract check was not assessed because the representative case could not be run with the required assignment CLI arguments. The report records that entrypoint or argument problem s...
Next step: Once one representative case writes both CSV files with the expected columns, the remaining case checks can focus on semantic correctness.
The watertaxi I/O contract check was not assessed because the representative case could not be run with the required assignment CLI arguments. The report records that entrypoint or argument problem separately.
Affects 1 check in 1 report item: Watertaxi I/O contract
Observed: The watertaxi I/O contract check was not assessed because the representative case could not be run with the required assignment CLI arguments. The report records that entrypoint or argument problem...
Next step: Once one representative case writes both CSV files with the expected columns, the remaining case checks can focus on semantic correctness.
The representative watertaxi travel-source case could not be evaluated because the submission could not be run with the required assignment CLI arguments. The report records the entrypoint or argument problem separately.
Affects 1 check in 1 report item: watertaxi-travel-source-contract - Watertaxi uses instance-local edge travel values
Observed: The representative watertaxi travel-source case could not be evaluated because the submission could not be run with the required assignment CLI arguments. The report records the entrypoint or argum...
Next step: Derive the expected output from the stated case data and objective priorities.

Test Cases

Open a case to see the expected result, the observed result, and the evidence files you should inspect next.

DARP correctness 0 / 20 fully correct (0%)
Every graded DARP correctness item in this section carries equal weight.
Case 1 / 20 NOT ASSESSED darp-01-basic — One request on a line — basic distance case
Not assessed
Case 2 / 20 NOT ASSESSED darp-02-capacity — Vehicle capacity forces one rejection
Not assessed
Case 3 / 20 NOT ASSESSED darp-03-timewindow — Time windows force the pickup order
Not assessed
Case 4 / 20 NOT ASSESSED darp-04-ridetime — Max ride time prevents interleaving
Not assessed
Case 5 / 20 NOT ASSESSED darp-05-multivehicle — Two vehicles needed — pickup windows too tight for one
Not assessed
Case 6 / 20 NOT ASSESSED darp-06-service-time — Service time delays departures but does not change distance
Not assessed
Case 7 / 20 NOT ASSESSED darp-07-wait — Pickup delay is measured from the earliest pickup time
Not assessed
Case 8 / 20 NOT ASSESSED darp-08-ride — Direct rides report total in-vehicle time
Not assessed
Case 9 / 20 NOT ASSESSED darp-09-collinear-fit — Two collinear requests fit one vehicle
Not assessed
Case 10 / 20 NOT ASSESSED darp-10-max-route-duration — Max route duration forces one rejection
Not assessed
Case 11 / 20 NOT ASSESSED darp-11-all-infeasible — All requests infeasible — both must be rejected
Not assessed
Case 12 / 20 NOT ASSESSED darp-13-load-5req — Five collinear requests — moderate scale
Not assessed
Case 13 / 20 NOT ASSESSED darp-14-rideshare — Ride-sharing — two passengers share one vehicle
Not assessed
Case 14 / 20 NOT ASSESSED darp-15-tight-tw — Tight time windows — arrival at the boundary
Not assessed
Case 15 / 20 NOT ASSESSED darp-16-max-ride-stretched — Max ride time at the boundary — interleaving barely fails
Not assessed
Case 16 / 20 NOT ASSESSED darp-17-batch-diff-dest-fit — Same pickup node, different dropoffs — one vehicle fits both
Not assessed
Case 17 / 20 NOT ASSESSED darp-18-batch-same-dest-fit — Same pickup and same dropoff — requests stay separate
Not assessed
Case 18 / 20 NOT ASSESSED darp-19-batch-diff-dest-split — Same pickup node, capacity 1 — must split across two vehicles
Not assessed
Case 19 / 20 NOT ASSESSED darp-20-batch-tight-window-no-share — Same pickup, capacity fits, but tight dropoff windows force split
Not assessed
Case 20 / 20 NOT ASSESSED darp-21-batch-identical-requests — Identical requests must not be merged
Not assessed
Watertaxi correctness 0 / 23 fully correct (0%)
Every graded Watertaxi correctness item in this section carries equal weight.
Case 1 / 23 NOT ASSESSED watertaxi-01-basic — Feasibility first, then prefer fewer vessels
Not assessed
Case 2 / 23 NOT ASSESSED watertaxi-02-service-time — Service time delays departures but does not change distance
Not assessed
Case 3 / 23 NOT ASSESSED watertaxi-03-dwell-time — Dwell time adds dock stop time without changing distance
Not assessed
Case 4 / 23 NOT ASSESSED watertaxi-04-shift — Vessel shift end forces one rejection
Not assessed
Case 5 / 23 NOT ASSESSED watertaxi-05-capacity — Vessel capacity rejects the oversized request
Not assessed
Case 6 / 23 NOT ASSESSED watertaxi-06-ride-ratio — Ride-time ratio blocks the cheaper interleaved route
Not assessed
Case 7 / 23 NOT ASSESSED watertaxi-07-multivehicle — Two vessels needed — pickup windows too tight for one
Not assessed
Case 8 / 23 NOT ASSESSED watertaxi-08-deadhead — Deadhead distance — empty legs depot-to-pickup and dropoff-to-depot
Not assessed
Case 9 / 23 NOT ASSESSED watertaxi-09-asymmetric — Asymmetric travel times — direction matters
Not assessed
Case 10 / 23 NOT ASSESSED watertaxi-10-distance-vs-drivetime — Distance and drive-time objectives produce different routes
Not assessed
Case 11 / 23 NOT ASSESSED watertaxi-11-all-infeasible — All requests infeasible — both must be rejected
Not assessed
Case 12 / 23 NOT ASSESSED watertaxi-12-network-edge-distance — Network edge distances override coordinates
Not assessed
Case 13 / 23 NOT ASSESSED watertaxi-13-tight-tw — Tight time windows — arrival at the boundary
Not assessed
Case 14 / 23 NOT ASSESSED watertaxi-14-rideshare — Ride-sharing — two requests share one vessel
Not assessed
Case 15 / 23 NOT ASSESSED watertaxi-15-ride-ratio-stretched — Ride-time ratio blocks the cheaper interleaved route
Not assessed
Case 16 / 23 NOT ASSESSED watertaxi-16-batch-diff-dest-fit — Same dock, different dropoffs — one vessel fits both
Not assessed
Case 17 / 23 NOT ASSESSED watertaxi-17-batch-same-dest-fit — Same pickup dock, same dropoff dock — requests stay separate
Not assessed
Case 18 / 23 NOT ASSESSED watertaxi-18-batch-diff-dest-split — Same pickup dock, capacity forces two vessels
Not assessed
Case 19 / 23 NOT ASSESSED watertaxi-19-batch-ride-ratio-no-share — Same pickup dock, ride-time ratio blocks sharing
Not assessed
Case 20 / 23 NOT ASSESSED watertaxi-20-batch-shift-split — Same pickup dock, shift length blocks sharing
Not assessed
Case 21 / 23 NOT ASSESSED watertaxi-21-distance-vs-wait — Distance and pickup-delay objectives produce different routes
Not assessed
Case 22 / 23 NOT ASSESSED watertaxi-22-weighted-normalized — Normalized weighted distance vs pickup delay
Not assessed
Case 23 / 23 NOT ASSESSED watertaxi-travel-source-contract — Watertaxi uses instance-local edge travel values
Not assessed