AS1 Anonymized Feedback: Submission B

Public anonymized showcase. This is the complete case-by-case feedback panel. Group identity, exact numeric grade, raw artifacts, logs, source paths, and hidden checker details have been omitted. Back to the results panel.

Grading date: 2026-05-18 17:42

Automated feedback for Assignment 1. Open a case to see what was expected, what your submission produced, and which files to inspect next.

33 / 43 test cases fully correct (77%)
476 / 488 automated checks passed (98%)
10 test cases need review
Show report details

Run scope: Full run across the loaded DARP and Watertaxi cases (43 total).

Case outcomes: 33 fully correct, 9 partial, 1 with no passing checks, 0 not assessed after an earlier run or output problem, 0 reduced-scope, 0 otherwise not assessed.

Automated checks passed: 476 / 488 (98%)

Compatibility handling: In 4 cases, the grader accepted an alternate flag, file, or entrypoint layout before checking correctness. This affected 11 passing checks.

Check Area Passed Needs Work Not Assessed Counts Toward Grade?
Execution47 / 4810No
Output format2 / 200No
Correctness427 / 4511113Yes

Priority Issues

Start with the most widespread problem first. Fixing one root cause often clears several cases at once.

Expected 'n_rejected' to be 1, but results.csv reported 2.0. Closest supported unit interpretation is n_rejected: 2.0 in canonical units, still off by 1.0.
Affects 2 checks in 2 report items: darp-02-capacity - Vehicle capacity forces one rejection, darp-10-max-route-duration - Max route duration forces one rejection
Next step: Open the affected cases below and inspect the linked evidence files.
The program stopped before the case finished.
Affects 1 check in 1 report item: watertaxi-05-capacity - Vessel capacity rejects the oversized request
Observed: Your program stopped before finishing: Traceback (most recent call last):
Next step: Derive the expected output from the stated case data and objective priorities.
Expected 'total_wait_s' to be 300, but results.csv reported 1200.0. Closest supported unit interpretation is total_wait_s already in seconds: 1200.0 in canonical units, still off by 900.0.
Affects 1 check in 1 report item: darp-07-wait - Pickup delay is measured from the earliest pickup time
Next step: Distance-feasible route: depot→P1→D1→P2→D2→depot. Total distance = 5 + 5 + 5 + 5 + 20 = 40 km (= 40000 m in outputs). The vehicle reaches R2 at t = 15 min, while R2's earliest pickup is t = 10 min, so R2 contributes 5 min (= 300 s) of pickup delay to total_wait_s.
Expected 'total_distance_m' to be 14.0, but results.csv reported 18.0. Closest supported unit interpretation is total_distance_m already in meters: 18.0 in canonical units, still off by 4.0.
Affects 1 check in 1 report item: watertaxi-06-ride-ratio - Ride-time ratio blocks the cheaper interleaved route
Next step: Derive the expected output from the stated case data and objective priorities.
Expected 'total_distance_m' to be 8.0, but results.csv reported 11.0. Closest supported unit interpretation is total_distance_m already in meters: 11.0 in canonical units, still off by 3.0.
Affects 1 check in 1 report item: watertaxi-10-distance-vs-drivetime - Distance and drive-time objectives produce different routes
Next step: Derive the expected output from the stated case data and objective priorities.
Expected 'total_drive_time_s' to be 1600.0, but results.csv reported 1800.0. Closest supported unit interpretation is total_drive_time_s already in seconds: 1800.0 in canonical units, still off by 200.0.
Affects 1 check in 1 report item: watertaxi-10-distance-vs-drivetime - Distance and drive-time objectives produce different routes
Observed: Expected 'total_drive_time_s' to be 1600.0, but results.csv reported 1800.0. Closest supported unit interpretation is total_drive_time_s already in seconds: 1800.0 in canonical units, still off by ...
Next step: Derive the expected output from the stated case data and objective priorities.
Expected 'n_rejected' to be 0, but results.csv reported 1.0. Closest supported unit interpretation is n_rejected: 1.0 in canonical units, still off by 1.0.
Affects 1 check in 1 report item: watertaxi-16-batch-diff-dest-fit - Same dock, different dropoffs — one vessel fits both
Next step: Derive the expected output from the stated case data and objective priorities.
Expected 'total_distance_m' to be 5.0, but results.csv reported 4.0. Closest supported unit interpretation is total_distance_m already in meters: 4.0 in canonical units, still off by 1.0.
Affects 1 check in 1 report item: watertaxi-16-batch-diff-dest-fit - Same dock, different dropoffs — one vessel fits both
Next step: Derive the expected output from the stated case data and objective priorities.

Compatibility Warnings

3 cases needed compatibility handling

These cases only ran because the grader accepted an alternate command-line form. The results could still be checked, but your submission should work with the published assignment CLI directly.

Affected checks: 11

Case Affected Checks What The Grader Accepted What You Should Fix
darp-02-capacity - Vehicle capacity forces one rejection3Alternate distance objective form accepted
Your CLI requires `--objective unserved=2000;distance=1` to run distance cases, but the assignment specifies `--objective distance`. Update your CLI to accept `distance` alone without a rejection-penalty prefix.
darp-10-max-route-duration - Max route duration forces one rejection3Alternate distance objective form accepted
Your CLI requires `--objective unserved=2000;distance=1` to run distance cases, but the assignment specifies `--objective distance`. Update your CLI to accept `distance` alone without a rejection-penalty prefix.
darp-11-all-infeasible - All requests infeasible — both must be rejected5Alternate distance objective form accepted
Your CLI requires `--objective unserved=2000;distance=1` to run distance cases, but the assignment specifies `--objective distance`. Update your CLI to accept `distance` alone without a rejection-penalty prefix.

Test Cases

Open a case to see the expected result, the observed result, and the evidence files you should inspect next.

DARP correctness 16 / 20 fully correct (80%)
Every graded DARP correctness item in this section carries equal weight.
Case 1 / 20 PARTIAL darp-02-capacity — Vehicle capacity forces one rejection
43% (3/7)
Case 2 / 20 PARTIAL darp-07-wait — Pickup delay is measured from the earliest pickup time
86% (6/7)
Case 3 / 20 PARTIAL darp-10-max-route-duration — Max route duration forces one rejection
60% (3/5)
Case 4 / 20 PARTIAL darp-11-all-infeasible — All requests infeasible — both must be rejected
83% (5/6)
Case 5 / 20 CORRECT darp-01-basic — One request on a line — basic distance case
100% (12/12)
Case 6 / 20 CORRECT darp-03-timewindow — Time windows force the pickup order
100% (8/8)
Case 7 / 20 CORRECT darp-04-ridetime — Max ride time prevents interleaving
100% (11/11)
Case 8 / 20 CORRECT darp-05-multivehicle — Two vehicles needed — pickup windows too tight for one
100% (11/11)
Case 9 / 20 CORRECT darp-06-service-time — Service time delays departures but does not change distance
100% (6/6)
Case 10 / 20 CORRECT darp-08-ride — Direct rides report total in-vehicle time
100% (7/7)
Case 11 / 20 CORRECT darp-09-collinear-fit — Two collinear requests fit one vehicle
100% (12/12)
Case 12 / 20 CORRECT darp-13-load-5req — Five collinear requests — moderate scale
100% (12/12)
Case 13 / 20 CORRECT darp-14-rideshare — Ride-sharing — two passengers share one vehicle
100% (13/13)
Case 14 / 20 CORRECT darp-15-tight-tw — Tight time windows — arrival at the boundary
100% (13/13)
Case 15 / 20 CORRECT darp-16-max-ride-stretched — Max ride time at the boundary — interleaving barely fails
100% (14/14)
Case 16 / 20 CORRECT darp-17-batch-diff-dest-fit — Same pickup node, different dropoffs — one vehicle fits both
100% (19/19)
Case 17 / 20 CORRECT darp-18-batch-same-dest-fit — Same pickup and same dropoff — requests stay separate
100% (19/19)
Case 18 / 20 CORRECT darp-19-batch-diff-dest-split — Same pickup node, capacity 1 — must split across two vehicles
100% (18/18)
Case 19 / 20 CORRECT darp-20-batch-tight-window-no-share — Same pickup, capacity fits, but tight dropoff windows force split
100% (18/18)
Case 20 / 20 CORRECT darp-21-batch-identical-requests — Identical requests must not be merged
100% (19/19)
Watertaxi correctness 17 / 23 fully correct (74%)
Every graded Watertaxi correctness item in this section carries equal weight.
Case 1 / 23 NEEDS WORK watertaxi-05-capacity — Vessel capacity rejects the oversized request
0% (0/5)
Case 2 / 23 PARTIAL watertaxi-06-ride-ratio — Ride-time ratio blocks the cheaper interleaved route
92% (11/12)
Case 3 / 23 PARTIAL watertaxi-10-distance-vs-drivetime — Distance and drive-time objectives produce different routes
82% (9/11)
Case 4 / 23 PARTIAL watertaxi-11-all-infeasible — All requests infeasible — both must be rejected
80% (4/5)
Case 5 / 23 PARTIAL watertaxi-16-batch-diff-dest-fit — Same dock, different dropoffs — one vessel fits both
63% (12/19)
Case 6 / 23 PARTIAL watertaxi-22-weighted-normalized — Normalized weighted distance vs pickup delay
94% (15/16)
Case 7 / 23 CORRECT watertaxi-01-basic — Feasibility first, then prefer fewer vessels
100% (21/21)
Case 8 / 23 CORRECT watertaxi-02-service-time — Service time delays departures but does not change distance
100% (6/6)
Case 9 / 23 CORRECT watertaxi-03-dwell-time — Dwell time adds dock stop time without changing distance
100% (6/6)
Case 10 / 23 CORRECT watertaxi-04-shift — Vessel shift end forces one rejection
100% (5/5)
Case 11 / 23 CORRECT watertaxi-07-multivehicle — Two vessels needed — pickup windows too tight for one
100% (11/11)
Case 12 / 23 CORRECT watertaxi-08-deadhead — Deadhead distance — empty legs depot-to-pickup and dropoff-to-depot
100% (6/6)
Case 13 / 23 CORRECT watertaxi-09-asymmetric — Asymmetric travel times — direction matters
100% (6/6)
Case 14 / 23 CORRECT watertaxi-12-network-edge-distance — Network edge distances override coordinates
100% (6/6)
Case 15 / 23 CORRECT watertaxi-13-tight-tw — Tight time windows — arrival at the boundary
100% (13/13)
Case 16 / 23 CORRECT watertaxi-14-rideshare — Ride-sharing — two requests share one vessel
100% (13/13)
Case 17 / 23 CORRECT watertaxi-15-ride-ratio-stretched — Ride-time ratio blocks the cheaper interleaved route
100% (13/13)
Case 18 / 23 CORRECT watertaxi-17-batch-same-dest-fit — Same pickup dock, same dropoff dock — requests stay separate
100% (19/19)
Case 19 / 23 CORRECT watertaxi-18-batch-diff-dest-split — Same pickup dock, capacity forces two vessels
100% (18/18)
Case 20 / 23 CORRECT watertaxi-19-batch-ride-ratio-no-share — Same pickup dock, ride-time ratio blocks sharing
100% (19/19)
Case 21 / 23 CORRECT watertaxi-20-batch-shift-split — Same pickup dock, shift length blocks sharing
100% (18/18)
Case 22 / 23 CORRECT watertaxi-21-distance-vs-wait — Distance and pickup-delay objectives produce different routes
100% (12/12)
Case 23 / 23 CORRECT watertaxi-travel-source-contract — Watertaxi uses instance-local edge travel values
100% (1/1)